Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
30
12:00 AM - Hepatology 2021
31
1
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
1
2
World Nanotechnology Congress 2021
2021-03-29    
All Day
Nano Technology Congress 2021 provides you with a unique opportunity to meet up with peers from both academic circle and industries level belonging to Recent [...]
Nanomedicine and Nanomaterials 2021
2021-03-29    
All Day
NanoMed 2021 conference provides the best platform of networking and connectivity with scientist, YRF (Young Research Forum) & delegates who are active in the field [...]
Smart Materials and Nanotechnology
2021-03-29 - 2021-03-30    
All Day
Smart Material 2021 clears a stage to globalize the examination by introducing an exchange amongst ventures and scholarly associations and information exchange from research to [...]
Hepatology 2021
2021-03-30 - 2021-03-31    
All Day
Hepatology 2021 provides a great platform by gathering eminent professors, Researchers, Students and delegates to exchange new ideas. The conference will cover a wide range [...]
Annual Congress on  Dental Medicine and Orthodontics
2021-04-05 - 2021-04-06    
All Day
Dentistry Medicine 2021 is a perfect opportunity intended for International well-being Dental and Oral experts too. The conference welcomes members from every driving university, clinical [...]
World Climate Congress & Expo 2021
2021-04-06 - 2021-04-07    
All Day
Climatology is the study of the atmosphere and weather patterns over time. This field of science focuses on recording and analyzing weather patterns throughout the [...]
European Food Chemistry and Drug Safety Congress
2021-04-12 - 2021-04-13    
All Day
We invite you to meet us at the Food Chemistry Congress 2021, where we will ensure that you’ll have a worthwhile experience with scholars of [...]
Proteomics, Genomics & Bioinformatics
2021-04-12 - 2021-04-13    
All Day
Proteomics 2021 is one of the front platforms for disseminating latest research results and techniques in Proteomics Research, Mass spectrometry, Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Biochemistry and [...]
Plant Science & Physiology
2021-04-17 - 2021-04-18    
All Day
The PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2021 theme has broad interests, which address many aspects of Plant Biology, Plant Science, Plant Physiology, Plant Biotechnology, and Plant Pathology. Research [...]
Pollution Control & Sustainable 2021
2021-04-26 - 2021-04-27    
All Day
Pollution Control 2021 conference is organizing with the theme of “Accelerating Innovations for Environmental Sustainability” Conference Series llc LTD organizes environmental conferences series 1000+ Global [...]
Events on 2021-03-30
Hepatology 2021
30 Mar 21
Events on 2021-04-06
Events on 2021-04-17
Events on 2021-04-26
Articles

Only Few met EHR compelling utilize criteria in 2012

HealthDay News — The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) recently announced that 2013 electronic health record implementation goals have already been met, but few clinicians say they are fulfilling the first stage of meaningful use criteria in a 2012 survey.

In March 2012, 43.5% of physicians who participated in the national survey said they had implemented basic EHR, an increase from 34% in 2011, but just 9.8% reported meeting meaningful use criteria, Catherine M. DesRoches, PhD, of Mathematica Policy Research in Cambridge, Mass., and colleagues reported in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Furthermore, managing patient populations with computerized systems was not widespread, with less than 50% of respondents reporting having a system for any of the patient population management tasks included in the survey.

“Results support the growing evidence that using the basic data input capabilities of an EHR does not translate into the greater opportunity that these technologies promise,” the researchers wrote.

“Meaningful use” refers to a set of criteria set forth in the 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, that healthcare providers must meet to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments. Those who meet the guidelines are eligible for up to $44,000 in incentive payments, but those who do not will be penalized beginning in 2015.

To assess progress toward meeting meaningful use criteria, DesRoches and colleagues conducted a national mailed survey of practicing primary care and office-based specialist physicians in the American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Masterfile from late 2011 to early 2012.

Physicians received three to four reminders to complete the survey and were offered $35 to $45 incentive checks to respond. A total of 1,820 completed the survey (60%) — 62% were primary care physicians (PCPs) and 56% were specialists. PCPs were more likely to work in smaller practices (39%) and to be part of a physician organization or network (67.4%) than specialists.

Meaningful use was defined as meeting 11 of the 15 stage one core requirements. Only 9.8% met these criteria, the researchers found.

The most common reported EHR uses were viewing lab results, writing prescriptions, viewing radiology or imaging results and recording clinical notes. Least common  uses included sharing patient clinical notes and lab and diagnostic test results externally, generating quality metrics and sending patients post-visit notes and copies of their health records.

Ease of use of these systems was varied. A system rating of “easy” was significantly more likely by physicians with an EHR that met meaningful use criteria compared to ratings by physicians with an EHR not meeting the standard.

Since 2011, Medicare and Medicaid made meaningful use payments to more than 145,000 healthcare providers (20% of those eligible), accounting for more than $3.9 billion in September 2012.

Differences in early EHR adopters vs. later EHR adopters in personal and practice characteristics may make later adopters more difficult to reach to ensure they are meeting meaningful use standards, the researchers noted.

“Given that many physicians have at least some functions in place, one promising strategy may be to focus on the distribution of adoption of individual meaningful use functions,” they wrote.

Study limitations included the potential for response bias, inability to verify EHR use accuracy, and the fact that the study’s definition of meaningful use did not include all criteria for stage one guidelines.

(Source)