Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
12:00 AM - 29th ECCMID
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
29th ECCMID
2019-04-13 - 2019-04-16    
All Day
Welcome to ECCMID 2019! We invite you to the 29th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, which will take place in Amsterdam, Netherlands, [...]
4th International Conference on  General Practice & Primary Care
2019-04-15 - 2019-04-16    
All Day
The 4th International Conference on General Practice & Primary Care going to be held at April 15-16, 2019 Berlin, Germany. Designation Statement The theme of [...]
Digital Health Conference 2019
2019-04-24 - 2019-04-25    
12:00 am
An Innovative Bridging for Modern Healthcare About Hosting Organization: conference series llc ltd |Conference Series llc ltd Houston USA| April 24-25,2019 Conference series llc ltd, [...]
International Conference on  Digital Health
2019-04-24 - 2019-04-25    
All Day
Details of Digital Health 2019 conference in USA : Conference Name                              [...]
16th Annual World Health Care Congress -WHCC19
2019-04-28 - 2019-05-01    
All Day
16th Annual World Health Care Congress will be organized during April 28 - May 1, 2019 at Washington, DC Who Attends Hospitals, Health Systems, & [...]
Events on 2019-04-13
29th ECCMID
13 Apr 19
Amsterdam
Events on 2019-04-24
Events on 2019-04-28
White Papers

Adopting an Enterprise Imaging Strategy

imaging strategy

Introduction
An auto accident victim with head injuries is rushed by ambulance to the nearest community hospital, where he is given a CT scan of the head. After reviewing the scan, the ER doctor decides that the patient needs a higher level of care than the community hospital can provide. The  patient is transferred along with a CD of the scan to a Level 1 trauma center. However, the trauma center’s picture archiving and communication  system (PACS) cannot read the CD, so the patient undergoes another head CT scan. The manual process of sharing diagnostic images on CD  delayed treatment for an injured patient, exposed the patient to unnecessary irradiation, and required a duplicate test that the patient’s insurance may not cover. If the community hospital had an enterprise imaging strategy in place, its ER physicians would have been able to send  the CT image electronically in a standardized format in real time to the trauma center. A radiologist at the trauma center could have used their native system to  quickly determine that trauma-level treatment was not necessary. The patient would have received care without delay and would have avoided  additional, potentially harmful radiation without incurring duplicate costs.

Although this example is fictitious, it illustrates an all too real scenario that plays out in hospitals,emergency rooms, and specialists’ offices across the U.S. every day – and the statistics illustrate the seriousness of the situation:

> The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) reported in 2009 that U.S. patients’ exposure to ionizing radiation – delivered through millions of CT scans and other radiation-generating procedures performed annually – has almost doubled over the last 20  years.
> According to a study published online in Radiology, from 1995 to 2007, the number of visits in which a CT scan was performed increased 6-fold, from 2.7 million to 16.2 million, representing a growth rate of 16% per year. The percentage of visits that were associated with a CT scan also increased substantially, from 2.8% of all visits in 1995 to 13.9% of all visits in 2007.
> Just one CT scan exposes a patient to the same amount of radiation as 100 chest x-rays, according to a 2010 study by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The radiation level in one CT scan of the abdomen is approximately the same as 400 chest x-rays.
> According to the American Society of Radiologic Technologists, healthcare organizations generate close to 600 million diagnostic imaging procedures annually.
> A 2009 report on the CBS Evening News indicated that $100 billion of annual healthcare costs are related to diagnostic imaging tests– but an estimated 35 percent are unnecessary scans. That translates to $35 billion in unnecessary costs for U.S. patients and insurance providers. Research and anecdotal evidence alike build a strong case for why diagnostic images should be easily accessed and shared electronically across
healthcare enterprises, regional healthcare information organizations (RHIOs), and statewide health information exchanges (HIEs). Why?
Diagnostic images make up a critical part of the diagnosis process. Yet today, the most common way they’re exchanged among providers and
referring physicians is by making a copy of the image onto a CD and giving it to the patient to take to the next appointment at a specialist’s practice or a hospital – an inefficient process that lends itself to human error and the risk of the CD being unreadable on the facility’s PACS.

Download the complete white paper here