Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
“The” international event in Healthcare Social Media, Mobile Apps, & Web 2.0
2015-06-04 - 2015-06-05    
All Day
What is Doctors 2.0™ & You? The fifth edition of the must-attend annual healthcare social media conference will take place in Paris;  it is the [...]
5th International Conference and Exhibition on Occupational Health & Safety
2015-06-06 - 2015-07-07    
All Day
Occupational Health 2016 welcomes attendees, presenters, and exhibitors from all over the world to Toronto, Canada. We are delighted to invite you all to attend [...]
National Healthcare Innovation Summit 2015
2015-06-15 - 2015-06-17    
All Day
The Leading Forum on Fast-Tracking Transformation to Achieve the Triple Aim Innovative leaders from across the health sector shared proven and real-world approaches, first-hand experiences [...]
Health IT Summit in Washington, DC
2015-06-16 - 2015-06-17    
All Day
The 2014 iHT2 Health IT Summit in Washington DC will bring together over 200 C-level, physician, practice management and IT decision-makers from North America's leading provider organizations and [...]
Events on 2015-06-15
Events on 2015-06-16
Health IT Summit in Washington, DC
16 Jun 15
Washington DC
Articles

Apr 05: Effects of EHR-based interventions on cervical cancer screening in adolescents

medicare ehr payments

White P, et al. – Researchers sought to determine whether the 2011 electronic health record (EHR) changes led to improved compliance with cervical cancer screening and management of abnormal results in adolescent (<21 y) patients, and found that implementation of two new prompts was associated with lower rates of unindicated Pap testing in adolescents but did not improve providers choosing the correct Pap type.

Methods

  • Two EHR prompts were implemented in May 2011.
  • The first is a bright yellow alert that pops up whenever a Pap test is ordered in a patient younger than 21 years, recommending against routine screening.
  • The second was a change in wording of the Pap order form, indicating that if Pap testing is done, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is not appropriate in this age group.

Results

  • The overall rate of Pap testing decreased after the EHR changes (86/759 [11.3%] before vs 69/1,274 [5.4%] after, P<0.0005).
  • The rate of Pap testing without a valid indication such as a 12–month follow–up of previous abnormal results also decreased (66/759 [8.7%] before vs 49/1,274 [3.8%] after, P<0.0005).
  • Most Pap tests (77%, both before and after EHR changes) were ordered with reflex HPV testing if atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
  • Use of the correct Pap order type (Pap alone, no HPV test) did not improve (16/86 [18.6%] vs 15/69 [22%], P=0.0857). Source