Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
29
30
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
12:00 AM - NextGen UGM 2025
Pathology Visions 2025
2025-10-05 - 2025-10-07    
8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Elevate Patient Care: Discover the Power of DP & AI Pathology Visions unites 800+ digital pathology experts and peers tackling today's challenges and shaping tomorrow's [...]
AHIMA25  Conference
2025-10-12 - 2025-10-14    
9:00 am - 10:00 pm
Register for AHIMA25  Conference Today! HI professionals—Minneapolis is calling! Join us October 12-14 for AHIMA25 Conference, the must-attend HI event of the year. In a city known for its booming [...]
Federal EHR Annual Summit
2025-10-21 - 2025-10-23    
9:00 am - 10:00 pm
The Federal Electronic Health Record Modernization (FEHRM) office brings together clinical staff from the Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Homeland Security’s [...]
NextGen UGM 2025
2025-11-02 - 2025-11-05    
12:00 am
NextGen UGM 2025 is set to take place in Nashville, TN, from November 2 to 5 at the Gaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center. This [...]
Events on 2025-10-05
Events on 2025-10-12
AHIMA25  Conference
12 Oct 25
Minnesota
Events on 2025-10-21
Events on 2025-11-02
NextGen UGM 2025
2 Nov 25
TN

Events

Articles

Nov 30: Make e-health record system ‘opt-out’, says AMA

obh launches

The Australian Medical Association said the personally controlled e-health record system should be an opt-out — not opt-in — service to boost consumer participation.

It said the personally controlled aspect of the e-health record system was a double-edged sword.

“The AMA supports individuals taking responsibility for their own health and recognises that personally controlled electronic health records could empower and encourage patients to do this,” the AMA said in its submission to the government’s PCEHR review.

“But it must be recognised that as a design feature of the PCEHR, patient control means that the PCEHR cannot be relied on as a trusted source of key clinical information.”

The AMA said an opt-out process would have been better as many people were not able to opt-in to the PCEHR.

“People who do not have the capacity to sign the registration form or have the legal documents in place to nominate an authorised representative to operate their PCEHR on their behalf.

“It may be that many of the people would benefit the most from the PCEHR may never have one – a consequence of the opt-in aspect of the PCEHR implementation.

“An opt-out system would have negated these particular barriers to consumer participation,” it wrote.

Low consumer participation was a barrier to medical practitioners who would be reluctant to use the system as a vast majority of patients don’t have a record or were active users.

In opposition, Health Minister Peter Dutton said that while more than 650,000 people had registered for an e-health record, only 4000-plus shared health summaries were created.

The summaries are generated by a patient’s GP and contain diagnoses, allergies and medications.

According to the submission, GP desktop software that interfaces with the PCEHR was built quickly and was not fit for regular use.

“Early experiences are that clinical workflow is neither seamless nor intuitive, adding to the time spent by doctors in accessing and uploading documents to the system.

“The AMA welcomes the work of the clinical usability program to address usability issues. This work should continue,” it wrote.

The association has called for a “practice” environment that is easily accessible from the desktop so healthcare practitioners can test drive the PCEHR before they use it in a clinical context.

“The PCEHR is governed by complex legislative arrangements that carry penalties for ‘unauthorised use’.

“As such, there is no environment for a medical practitioner who wants to explore how they might use the PCEHR in clinical practice to do so in a way that does not risk contravening the legislation,” the submission says.

AMA vice-president Professor Geoffrey Dobb said that while the AMA acknowledges concerns that patient privacy is paramount, it must be “balanced with the need for the PCEHR to make healthcare safer, more efficient and more effective”.

“Without fundamental change to increased clinical confidence, the PCEHR does not serve the best interests of patients.

“As a result, it would be rejected by many doctors and would fail,” Professor said.
source