Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
C.D. Howe Institute Roundtable Luncheon
2014-04-28    
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm
Navigating the Healthcare System: The Patient’s Perspective Please join us for this Roundtable Luncheon at the C.D. Howe Institute with Richard Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer, [...]
DoD / VA EHR and HIT Summit
DSI announces the 6th iteration of our DoD/VA iEHR & HIE Summit, now titled “DoD/VA EHR & HIT Summit”. This slight change in title is to help [...]
Electronic Medical Records: A Conversation
2014-05-09    
1:00 pm - 3:30 pm
WID, the Holtz Center for Science & Technology Studies and the UW–Madison Office of University Relations are offering a free public dialogue exploring electronic medical records (EMRs), a rapidly disseminating technology [...]
The National Conference on Managing Electronic Records (MER) - 2014
2014-05-19    
All Day
" OUTSTANDING QUALITY – Every year, for over 10 years, 98% of the MER’s attendees said they would recommend the MER! RENOWNED SPEAKERS – delivering timely, accurate information as well as an abundance of practical ideas. 27 SESSIONS AND 11 TOPIC-FOCUSED THEMES – addressing your organization’s needs. FULL RANGE OF TOPICS – with sessions focusing on “getting started”, “how to”, and “cutting-edge”, to “thought leadership”. INCISIVE CASE STUDIES – from those responsible for significant implementations and integrations, learn how they overcame problems and achieved success. GREAT NETWORKING – by interacting with peer professionals, renowned authorities, and leading solution providers, you can fast-track solving your organization’s problems. 22 PREMIER EXHIBITORS – in productive 1:1 private meetings, learn how the MER 2014 exhibitors are able to address your organization’s problems. "
Chicago 2014 National Conference for Medical Office Professionals
2014-05-21    
12:00 am
3 Full Days of Training Focused on Optimizing Medical Office Staff Productivity, Profitability and Compliance at the Sheraton Chicago Hotel & Towers Featuring Keynote Presentation [...]
Events on 2014-04-28
Events on 2014-05-06
DoD / VA EHR and HIT Summit
6 May 14
Alexandria
Events on 2014-05-09
Latest News

Payment Rule to Change Clinical Quality Measure Requirements

The final rule for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) brings significant changes to electronic clinical quality measures reporting for hospitals participating in the EHR Incentive Programs.

cms-ipps-clinical-quality-reporting

The final IPPS rule states that eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals will not have to report four quarters of data for eight of the 15 Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) clinical quality measures. In the proposed rule, hospitals and CAHs were required to report all 15 Hospital IQR clinical quality measures.

These changes apply to the 2019 payment determination and going forward.

According to CMS, they have made these changes to better align all agency programs and reduce the reporting burden for hospital employees. Several industry stakeholders have expressed frustration at the duplicative reporting requirements across various CMS programs, so in aligning the clinical quality measures collected in both the EHR Incentive Programs and in IPPS, the agency hopes to have alleviated some of those concerns.

“Our goal for the future is to align the clinical quality measure requirements of the Hospital IQR Program with various other Medicare and Medicaid programs, including those authorized by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, so that the reporting burden on providers will be reduced,” says the final rule, which has been published in digital format in the Federal Register.

“As appropriate, we will consider the adoption of clinical quality measures with electronic specifications so that the electronic collection of performance information is a seamless component of care delivery.”

As a result, CMS will need to establish more interoperable and robust technology infrastructure to better accommodate both EHRs and CMS data stores. Despite this difficulty, CMS says these modifications will ultimately lower program and hospital costs and improve the CQM reporting system on the whole.

“Once these activities are accomplished, adoption of measures that rely on data obtained directly from EHRs will enable us to expand the Hospital IQR Program measure set with less cost and reporting burden to hospitals,” the rule says.

“We believe that in the near future, collection and reporting of data elements through EHRs will greatly simplify and streamline reporting for various CMS quality reporting programs, and that hospitals will be able to switch primarily to EHR-based data reporting for many measures that are currently manually chart-abstracted and submitted to CMS for the Hospital IQR Program.”

Recently, CMS has faced much ado regarding the CQM reporting program. A recent surveyconducted by the American Hospital Association (AHA) and the Federation of American Hospitals (FAH) found that 78 percent of hospitals are not prepared to report their electronic CQMs (eCQMs).

According to the survey, 37 percent of hospitals have much work to do before the February 2017 reporting deadline, and 41 percent have at least some preparation. Only 18 percent report being in good shape leading into the deadline.

Hospital EHRs may be to blame for these difficulties. Among the handful of hospitals which reported that they will request an extraordinary circumstances waiver in place of reporting eCQMs, most said it was because of a newly-implemented or optimized EHR.

For all of these issues, however, the report showed some light at the end of the tunnel. Over half of the surveyed hospitals said that February 28, 2017 was a feasible deadline for eCQM reporting.

Hospitals cited employee skill and vendor support as primary reasons for their confidence. Sixty-four percent of hospitals said they were confident in their staff’s skills in data extraction for eCQM reporting, and most agreed that they had ample EHR vendor support in the endeavor.

Going forward, CMS will have to collect industry feedback and determine if the above-mentioned IPPS changes will help assist any apprehensive hospitals in eCQM reporting. Prior to the final rule’s release this past week, many hospitals reported that the IPPS clinical quality measure reporting requirements were too arduous. Ideally, the new modifications will help make the reporting simpler and more streamlined.

Source