Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12:00 AM - DEVICE TALKS
9
11
12
13
14
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
DEVICE TALKS
DEVICE TALKS BOSTON 2018: BIGGER AND BETTER THAN EVER! Join us Oct. 8-10 for the 7th annual DeviceTalks Boston, back in the city where it [...]
6th Annual HealthIMPACT Midwest
2018-10-10    
All Day
REV1 VENTURES COLUMBUS, OH The Provider-Patient Experience Summit - Disrupting Delivery without Disrupting Care HealthIMPACT Midwest is focused on technologies impacting clinician satisfaction and performance. [...]
15 Oct
2018-10-15 - 2018-10-16    
All Day
Conference Series Ltd invites all the participants from all over the world to attend “3rd International Conference on Environmental Health” during October 15-16, 2018 in Warsaw, Poland which includes prompt keynote [...]
17 Oct
2018-10-17 - 2018-10-19    
7:00 am - 6:00 pm
BALANCING TECHNOLOGY AND THE HUMAN ELEMENT In an era when digital technologies enable individuals to track health statistics such as daily activity and vital signs, [...]
Epigenetics Congress 2018
2018-10-25 - 2018-10-26    
All Day
Conference: 5th World Congress on Epigenetics and Chromosome Date: October 25-26, 2018 Place: Istanbul, Turkey Email: epigeneticscongress@gmail.com About Conference: Epigenetics congress 2018 invites all the [...]
Events on 2018-10-08
DEVICE TALKS
8 Oct 18
425 Summer Street
Events on 2018-10-10
Events on 2018-10-17
17 Oct
Events on 2018-10-25
Epigenetics Congress 2018
25 Oct 18
Istanbul
White Papers

Adopting an Enterprise Imaging Strategy

imaging strategy

Introduction
An auto accident victim with head injuries is rushed by ambulance to the nearest community hospital, where he is given a CT scan of the head. After reviewing the scan, the ER doctor decides that the patient needs a higher level of care than the community hospital can provide. The  patient is transferred along with a CD of the scan to a Level 1 trauma center. However, the trauma center’s picture archiving and communication  system (PACS) cannot read the CD, so the patient undergoes another head CT scan. The manual process of sharing diagnostic images on CD  delayed treatment for an injured patient, exposed the patient to unnecessary irradiation, and required a duplicate test that the patient’s insurance may not cover. If the community hospital had an enterprise imaging strategy in place, its ER physicians would have been able to send  the CT image electronically in a standardized format in real time to the trauma center. A radiologist at the trauma center could have used their native system to  quickly determine that trauma-level treatment was not necessary. The patient would have received care without delay and would have avoided  additional, potentially harmful radiation without incurring duplicate costs.

Although this example is fictitious, it illustrates an all too real scenario that plays out in hospitals,emergency rooms, and specialists’ offices across the U.S. every day – and the statistics illustrate the seriousness of the situation:

> The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) reported in 2009 that U.S. patients’ exposure to ionizing radiation – delivered through millions of CT scans and other radiation-generating procedures performed annually – has almost doubled over the last 20  years.
> According to a study published online in Radiology, from 1995 to 2007, the number of visits in which a CT scan was performed increased 6-fold, from 2.7 million to 16.2 million, representing a growth rate of 16% per year. The percentage of visits that were associated with a CT scan also increased substantially, from 2.8% of all visits in 1995 to 13.9% of all visits in 2007.
> Just one CT scan exposes a patient to the same amount of radiation as 100 chest x-rays, according to a 2010 study by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The radiation level in one CT scan of the abdomen is approximately the same as 400 chest x-rays.
> According to the American Society of Radiologic Technologists, healthcare organizations generate close to 600 million diagnostic imaging procedures annually.
> A 2009 report on the CBS Evening News indicated that $100 billion of annual healthcare costs are related to diagnostic imaging tests– but an estimated 35 percent are unnecessary scans. That translates to $35 billion in unnecessary costs for U.S. patients and insurance providers. Research and anecdotal evidence alike build a strong case for why diagnostic images should be easily accessed and shared electronically across
healthcare enterprises, regional healthcare information organizations (RHIOs), and statewide health information exchanges (HIEs). Why?
Diagnostic images make up a critical part of the diagnosis process. Yet today, the most common way they’re exchanged among providers and
referring physicians is by making a copy of the image onto a CD and giving it to the patient to take to the next appointment at a specialist’s practice or a hospital – an inefficient process that lends itself to human error and the risk of the CD being unreadable on the facility’s PACS.

Download the complete white paper here