Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
Electronic Medical Records Boot Camp
2025-06-30 - 2025-07-01    
10:30 am - 5:30 pm
The Electronic Medical Records Boot Camp is a two-day intensive boot camp of seminars and hands-on analytical sessions to provide an overview of electronic health [...]
AI in Healthcare Forum
2025-07-10 - 2025-07-11    
10:00 am - 5:00 pm
Jeff Thomas, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, shares how the migration not only saved the organization millions of dollars but also led to [...]
28th World Congress on  Nursing, Pharmacology and Healthcare
2025-07-21 - 2025-07-22    
10:00 am - 5:00 pm
To Collaborate Scientific Professionals around the World Conference Date:  July 21-22, 2025
5th World Congress on  Cardiovascular Medicine Pharmacology
2025-07-24 - 2025-07-25    
10:00 am - 5:00 pm
About Conference The 5th World Congress on Cardiovascular Medicine Pharmacology, scheduled for July 24-25, 2025 in Paris, France, invites experts, researchers, and clinicians to explore [...]
Events on 2025-06-30
Events on 2025-07-10
AI in Healthcare Forum
10 Jul 25
New York
Events on 2025-07-21
Events on 2025-07-24

Events

Articles

Are EHR Template Limitations Slowing Adoption?

ehr template

Limitations of legacy systems may be slowing EHR adoption amongst providers, can custom templates win over stragglers?

By Lisa Kerner, contributing writer

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is more than half way towards its goal of provider electronic health record (EHR) adoption according to a Healthcare Technology Online article, but physicians’ dissatisfaction with EHR systems is still a concern. The article notes several factors that are slowing EHR adoption including provider’s fear “of workflow disruptions and productivity losses,” provider’s age, and practice size.

Dr. Joel S. Koenig, whose Missouri-based practice is ineligible for meaningful use incentives, offers another reason. Writing for PhysBizTech Koenig notes, “While evaluating systems … I found none fit my practice workflows. In particular, they required use of pre-defined templates, forcing me to fill in multiple data fields that were irrelevant to my practice.”

Koenig continues, “I opted to go with an EMR that let me configure nearly everything. I knew this approach would require more of my time up front, but I was confident that custom-designed templates would eliminate productivity declines and provide quicker returns on time and costs invested. “

According to Koenig, the results have been worth the upfront time. “Instead of struggling for months to regain pre-implementation productivity levels and realize a return on my EMR investment, my experience was exactly opposite. Using a customized EMR has increased patient satisfaction, in particular with e-prescribing, enabling me to use tablet computer in the exam room,” in addition to reporting a saving of $500 a month on off-site storage costs and reclaiming the use of two exam rooms previously lost to storage.

A recent Healthcare Informatics echoes Koenig’s concern of legacy systems, writing many physicians are struggling to use current “point-and-click systems.” Authors Ted Reynolds and Marla Roberts, DrPH, R.N. continue, “Oftentimes poor integration, workflow design, and minimal query capabilities are to blame for low usability.” While the industry may be adopting technology, the authors say, “The current challenge is to focus on usability from the clinician’s perspective, particularly physicians.”

Reynolds and Roberts acknowledge “generational differences” affect the rate of technology adoption, however they believe “it is also true that when more tech-savvy physicians experience a move from a well designed EHR to a poorly designed one, the resulting frustration is the same.” For many physicians, achieving meaningful use “has become a simple exercise of ‘clicking the box’ to receive incentives rather than truly utilizing the EHR to achieve quality improvement,” said Reynolds and Roberts. Source