EncounterPRO EHR 5.0
Encounterpro ehr 5.0 Pediatric EMR Workflow System has given physicians time: time to go home early; to get to the gym; to see more patients; and to do what you do best, practice medicine. The first successful example of clinical groupware for the medical office (of which we are aware), EncounterPRO was also the first Windows-based pediatric EMR (and is still the only Workflow Management System for ambulatory medicine, period). It doesn’t matter how computer-phobic your staff is, they’ll find the EncounterPRO Pediatric EMR as simple to use as an ATM cash machine. EncounterPRO will drive down your costs, increase the number of patients you can see, reduce patient wait times, and improve patient satisfaction encounterpro ehr 5.0
Increasing EMR adoption should not be based on overcoming resistance to EMRs. Who’s resisting? Unenlightened physicians? Who’s overcoming? A Borg-like combination of everyone else?
The practice of primary care medicine is a high-volume, low-margin operation and anyone running such a business, who is interested in his or her economic survival, should object to installing anything that costs too much, hurts productivity, and lessens the probability of their survival. The problem is not that the medical community or any part thereof is “resisting” the addition of EMR’s. The problem is that most EMRs are just expensive ways to slow physicians down and lose them money. The only narrow sense in which there is something about physician attitudes that must be overcome is the stereotype that all EMRs necessarily do so. When an EMR (especially an inexpensive free open source EMR) helps the physician maintain profitability in the face of seriously declining prices (mandated by the government and insurance companies) physicians welcome the help.
Specialty-specific EMR workflow systems, such those made possible by the EncounterPRO-OS EMR clinical groupware platform, are the key to flexible, fast, easy, and accurate data and order entry and coordination of care–not overcoming so-called physician resistance to traditional “singleware” EMRs. If you will take time to understand the reasons why we believe what we believe, you will understand, and we hope, share our vision.