Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
Electronic Medical Records Boot Camp
2025-06-30 - 2025-07-01    
10:30 am - 5:30 pm
The Electronic Medical Records Boot Camp is a two-day intensive boot camp of seminars and hands-on analytical sessions to provide an overview of electronic health [...]
AI in Healthcare Forum
2025-07-10 - 2025-07-11    
10:00 am - 5:00 pm
Jeff Thomas, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, shares how the migration not only saved the organization millions of dollars but also led to [...]
28th World Congress on  Nursing, Pharmacology and Healthcare
2025-07-21 - 2025-07-22    
10:00 am - 5:00 pm
To Collaborate Scientific Professionals around the World Conference Date:  July 21-22, 2025
5th World Congress on  Cardiovascular Medicine Pharmacology
2025-07-24 - 2025-07-25    
10:00 am - 5:00 pm
About Conference The 5th World Congress on Cardiovascular Medicine Pharmacology, scheduled for July 24-25, 2025 in Paris, France, invites experts, researchers, and clinicians to explore [...]
Events on 2025-06-30
Events on 2025-07-10
AI in Healthcare Forum
10 Jul 25
New York
Events on 2025-07-21
Events on 2025-07-24

Events

Articles

Nov 26: Bulk of wasted DOD, VA iEHR money went to support contracts

practice fusion guarantees

Think Epic implementation is a costly prospect?  How about spending $1.1 billion on a joint Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs EHR that never even got off the ground?  New reports from the Interagency Program Office (IPO), now in charge of the convoluted effort to modernize the Military Health System’s electronic record keeping software, show that the majority of the spending in 2011 and 2012 went to secure service support contracts for employees.  While the project made progress in establishing a framework for interoperability and outlining the technical challenges of a joint EHR, questions remain about just how the office spent a large chunk of its budget

In 2012, the IPO spent a total of $351.9 million, apportioning $329.2 million of that money for support services, intended to help fill the 236 staff vacancies in the office.  By the end of the year, 141 of the open positions were filled with federal civilian employees for DOD and VA employees assigned to the project, while the remaining spots were taken by contractors.  The interagency office only spent $19 million on securing government staff during the same time.
“In a  dynamic  and  ongoing  process  of  developing  a  single,  integrated  EHR  system  for  the Departments,  IPO  program,  technical,  and  clinical  informatics  teams  fully  defined  and scheduled joint Departments capabilities and processes for the Departments’ iEHR,” the report notes.  “To meet challenges of managing the sizable and complex task of modernizing the Departments’ legacy health IT systems the IPO focused on building and maturing the IPO, designing the iEHR solution,  exercising  governance, reducing risk to the  iEHR  program,  building  iEHR technical infrastructure,  and  defining  clinical  and  technical  requirements.”
However, all this work came to a skidding halt in February as the DOD and VA abruptly announced the end of the joint EHR program, intending to focus instead on two separate systems that will eventually be interoperable.  VA Secretary Eric Shinseki and Frank Kendall, Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisitions, who was given budgetary control of the project, said that after laying the foundations for the iEHR, the costs for following through had jumped to a potential $28 billion.
The IPO reports show that staffing challenges and bureaucratic red tape were major impediments to the success of the original blueprints, and that senior officials were lax in their responsibilities to approve requests in a reasonable timeframe.
After facing a Congressional firing squad and significant dissent from within its ranks, the Pentagon and VA have revamped the IPO under Christopher Miller, who has taken the DOD through the process of exploring commercial EHR options to replace its legacy system. “I’m looking for the best value,” Miller said of his recent work. “There [are] no preconceived ideas or notions. We are just trying to make sure we get the best value that meets our requirements that really sets us forward where we need to be for the future.”