Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12:00 AM - DEVICE TALKS
9
11
12
13
14
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
DEVICE TALKS
DEVICE TALKS BOSTON 2018: BIGGER AND BETTER THAN EVER! Join us Oct. 8-10 for the 7th annual DeviceTalks Boston, back in the city where it [...]
6th Annual HealthIMPACT Midwest
2018-10-10    
All Day
REV1 VENTURES COLUMBUS, OH The Provider-Patient Experience Summit - Disrupting Delivery without Disrupting Care HealthIMPACT Midwest is focused on technologies impacting clinician satisfaction and performance. [...]
15 Oct
2018-10-15 - 2018-10-16    
All Day
Conference Series Ltd invites all the participants from all over the world to attend “3rd International Conference on Environmental Health” during October 15-16, 2018 in Warsaw, Poland which includes prompt keynote [...]
17 Oct
2018-10-17 - 2018-10-19    
7:00 am - 6:00 pm
BALANCING TECHNOLOGY AND THE HUMAN ELEMENT In an era when digital technologies enable individuals to track health statistics such as daily activity and vital signs, [...]
Epigenetics Congress 2018
2018-10-25 - 2018-10-26    
All Day
Conference: 5th World Congress on Epigenetics and Chromosome Date: October 25-26, 2018 Place: Istanbul, Turkey Email: epigeneticscongress@gmail.com About Conference: Epigenetics congress 2018 invites all the [...]
Events on 2018-10-08
DEVICE TALKS
8 Oct 18
425 Summer Street
Events on 2018-10-10
Events on 2018-10-17
17 Oct
Events on 2018-10-25
Epigenetics Congress 2018
25 Oct 18
Istanbul
Articles

Oct 28: Majority Of Ambulatory Physicians Had Capability To Exchange Prescription Data In 2011

ambulatory physicians

Majority of ambulatory physicians had capability to exchange prescription and laboratory data in 2011

A new study conducted by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) researchers, using data from a 2011 survey of physicians, finds that a majority of office-based physicians were able to view lab results and send medication data electronically. The study also finds that one-third of ambulatory care physicians could send and/or receive patient clinical summaries with other providers.

“The results of this study are encouraging because they show that a majority of physicians who use electronic health records (EHRs) can electronically exchange test results, medication data and clinical care summaries with patients, all of which are integral to better care coordination and ultimately necessary for universal interoperability,” said Vaishali Patel, an ONC senior advisor and lead author of the study. “As Stage 2 of Meaningful Use moves forward, it will be important to continue monitoring physicians’ exchange capabilities and actual exchange activity to ensure that health information follows the patient wherever they go.”

The ONC study found that the adoption of an EHR was the single strongest predictor of electronic exchange capability for e-prescribing, lab test viewing or ordering, and exchanging clinical summaries. However, results from the study show that not all EHR vendors offer equivalent exchange capability.

The topline findings of the study, published today in the American Journal of Managed Care(http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2013/2013-1-vol19-n10/Physician-Capability-to-Electronically-Exchange-Clinical-Information-2011) Vol. 19, No. 10, include:

– 55 percent of all physicians had computerized capability to send prescriptions electronically vs. 78 percent of physicians with an EHR.

– 67 percent of all physicians could view electronic lab results vs. 87 percent of physicians with an EHR.

– 42 percent could incorporate lab results into their EHR vs. 73 percent of physicians with an EHR.

– 35 percent could send an electronic order to a lab vs. 54 percent of physicians with an EHR.

– 38 percent could provide clinical summaries to patients vs. 61 percent of physicians with an EHR.

– 31 percent exchanged patient clinical summaries with another provider vs. 49 percent of physicians with an EHR.

Results of the study indicate that there was variation among physician exchange capability at the state-level. Physicians in Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oregon, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin reported the capability to exchange clinical information at rates significantly higher than the national average in at least 4 out of 6 measures of exchange capability examined.

Using data from 2011, the study authors posit that this is a baseline study of physician capability to exchange key types of clinical information. The study authors suggest that the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentives Programs and the State Health Information Exchange Program may drive improvement in physician exchange capability. Further, the study also suggests that health-care delivery reforms contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, including Accountable Care Organization/shared savings programs, are likely to provide financial incentives to spur even greater health information exchange.

“Specifically, accountable care organizations, which allow entities to share cost savings, may create a business case for HIE by giving providers greater financial incentives to exchange information regarding their patients with each other. Additionally, financial penalties for high hospital readmission rates, for example, may spur greater care coordination between hospitals and ambulatory care providers to better manage transitions of care through the use of care summaries,” ONC researchers wrote.

Data for this study are from the 2011 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Electronic Medical Record Supplement (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db79.htm), conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’sNational Center for Health Statistics as an annual, nationally representative survey of office-based physicians that collects information on the adoption and use of EMR/EHR systems. The target universe of the NAMCS is physicians providing direct patient care in office-based practices, including physicians in community health centers. Radiologists, anesthesiologists, and pathologists are excluded. The overall sample consisted of 4,326 physician respondents, with a 61 percent weighted response rate. The sample size is sufficient to generate state-level and national estimates.

 

 

source