Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12:00 AM - DEVICE TALKS
9
11
12
13
14
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
DEVICE TALKS
DEVICE TALKS BOSTON 2018: BIGGER AND BETTER THAN EVER! Join us Oct. 8-10 for the 7th annual DeviceTalks Boston, back in the city where it [...]
6th Annual HealthIMPACT Midwest
2018-10-10    
All Day
REV1 VENTURES COLUMBUS, OH The Provider-Patient Experience Summit - Disrupting Delivery without Disrupting Care HealthIMPACT Midwest is focused on technologies impacting clinician satisfaction and performance. [...]
15 Oct
2018-10-15 - 2018-10-16    
All Day
Conference Series Ltd invites all the participants from all over the world to attend “3rd International Conference on Environmental Health” during October 15-16, 2018 in Warsaw, Poland which includes prompt keynote [...]
17 Oct
2018-10-17 - 2018-10-19    
7:00 am - 6:00 pm
BALANCING TECHNOLOGY AND THE HUMAN ELEMENT In an era when digital technologies enable individuals to track health statistics such as daily activity and vital signs, [...]
Epigenetics Congress 2018
2018-10-25 - 2018-10-26    
All Day
Conference: 5th World Congress on Epigenetics and Chromosome Date: October 25-26, 2018 Place: Istanbul, Turkey Email: epigeneticscongress@gmail.com About Conference: Epigenetics congress 2018 invites all the [...]
Events on 2018-10-08
DEVICE TALKS
8 Oct 18
425 Summer Street
Events on 2018-10-10
Events on 2018-10-17
17 Oct
Events on 2018-10-25
Epigenetics Congress 2018
25 Oct 18
Istanbul
Articles

Step by Step Instructions to Measure EMR Success

emr
Read More

Converting from a record system using paper charts to an electronic medical record (EMR) system requires significant amounts of money, time and personnel participation. In the United States, 70 percent of physicians practice in small- to medium-size groups and half of the groups that try to convert to an EMR system do not succeed. Measurements can be made of the process of implementing various operational units, such as laboratory findings, or the results of completed unit conversions on efficiency, patient care, personnel and profitability.

Instructions

1. List the operational units which have an EMR system in place. This ordinarily ranges from in-house ancillary departments such as pharmacy, radiology and laboratory to full implementation of physician documentation/charting and less frequently to patient access to their records on their computers at home.2. Work with personnel in each unit to determine what they consider the important tasks they want the EMR system in their unit to accomplish. Pharmacy’s primary goal is probably an error-free medication ordering system, since pharmacists know a hand-written prescription system is prone to errors. They may also desire the EMR system to notify the physician if her choice of medication is contraindicated for her patient or if that medication is not in the medical group’s formulary. The coding and billing unit’s goal is having every procedure listed so they can print out all the charges to third-party payors and patients at appropriate intervals without needing to manually code the information.3. Set standards and collect two types of data, numerical (quantitative) and judgment (qualitative). If the paper prescription system produced one error for every 1,000 prescriptions filled, the pharmacists may think a successful EMR system should produce no more than one error in 20,000 prescriptions. Ask the pharmacists, physicians and a sample of patients to respond to a short questionnaire about their perceptions of the system in the pharmacy. Analyze these two sources of data.

Examine medication errors to calculate an average cost. Multiplying this amount by the number of errors reduced ads to the value of the EMR system. Determine the extent to which the EMR system has increased efficiency in the pharmacy and other units and if the efficiencies resulted in greater profit.

4. Prepare a report that documents the assessment findings. Describe other factors you can test for which are not unit specific, such as increased patient safety; physician, staff and patient satisfaction; and faster billing cycles.List results that may not be positive, such as a physician who leaves the group’s practice because he does not wish to use the computer.

(Source)