Events Calendar

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
12:00 AM - Epic UGM 2025
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
The 2025 DirectTrust Annual Conference
2025-08-04 - 2025-08-07    
12:00 am
Three of the most interesting healthcare topics are going to be featured at the DirectTrust Annual conference this year: Interoperability, Identity, and Cybersecurity. These are [...]
ALS Nexus Event Recap and Overview
2025-08-11 - 2025-08-14    
12:00 am
International Conference on Wearable Medical Devices and Sensors
2025-08-12    
12:00 am
Conference Details: International Conference on Wearable Medical Devices and Sensors , on 12th Aug 2025 at New York, New York, USA . The key intention [...]
Epic UGM 2025
2025-08-18 - 2025-08-21    
12:00 am
The largest gathering of Epic Users at the Epic user conference in Verona. Generally highlighted by Epic’s keynote where she often makes big announcements about [...]
Events on 2025-08-04
Events on 2025-08-11
Events on 2025-08-18
Epic UGM 2025
18 Aug 25
Verona
Case Studies

How the Provenance of EHR Data Matters for Research: A Case Example Using System Mapping

electronic medical record software

Submission Type

Case Study

Abstract

Introduction: The use of electronic health records (EHRs) for research is proceeding rapidly, driven by computational power, analytical techniques, and policy. However, EHR-based research is limited by the complexity of EHR data and a lack of understanding about data provenance, meaning the context under which the data were collected. This paper presents system flow mapping as a method to help researchers more fully understand the provenance of their EHR data as it relates to local workflow. We provide two specific examples of how this method can improve data identification, documentation, and processing.

Background: EHRs store clinical and administrative data, often in unstructured fields. Each clinical system has a unique and dynamic workflow and EHR, which may be influenced by broader context such as documentation required for billing.

Methods: We present a case study with two examples of using system flow mapping to characterize EHR data for a local colorectal cancer screening process.

Findings: System flow mapping demonstrated that information entered into the EHR during clinical practice required interpretation and transformation before it could be accurately applied to research. We illustrate how system flow mapping shaped our knowledge of the quality and completeness of data in two examples: 1) determining colonoscopy indication as recorded in the EHR, and 2) discovering a specific EHR form that captured family history.

Discussion: Researchers who do not consider data provenance risk compiling data that are systematically incomplete or incorrect. For example, researchers who are not familiar with the clinical workflow under which data were entered might miss or misunderstand patient information or procedure and diagnostic codes.

Conclusions/Next steps: Data provenance is a fundamental characteristic of research data from EHRs. Given the diversity of EHR platforms and system workflows, researchers need tools for evaluating and reporting data availability, quality, and transformations. Our case study illustrates how system mapping can inform researchers about the provenance of their data as it pertains to local workflows.

Download Here